Sunday, March 29, 2009

Burst Red Capillaries

reactions. I explain that they are "bright areas" of the photographs.

Hi, I received several e-mails warning me that some published photographs, particularly those of "light balls" have an explanation merely "natural." Here is my answer:


1.
Reflections of the camera,
MOVING! (ha ha):


2.
Extract from an article by Discovery Channel:
evidence "Orbs or dust?

Since the advent of digital cameras has been a fierce debate about the authenticity of the orbs. They are circular patterns that appear in photographs taken digitally and 35mm cameras.

The first orb photographs were taken by American ghost hunters in cemeteries, in early 1990. They believed that the orbs were the souls of the dead hovering around their tombs. Then, the orbs were photographed in haunted places, suggesting that they were a form of energy associated with the paranormal.

For many years it was assumed that the orbs were paranormal activity, but soon more researchers began to prove that what they seemed. A group of British specialists showed that, depending on the camera, you can get orbs of different structures and colors. And not only that, but moisture and dust in the air causes similar effects.

tests were made with various substances such as sand, dirt and moisture. The results proved that the thousands of orb photographs could be easily explained.


Manufacturers began to take note of these results, equipping recent digital cameras with a filter-free "orb" and showing that these spots were a little more than technical brilliance
.
3.

The "orbs" nuna out well in the photos, which tend to eliminate the idea that these are due to defects in the lens or digital pixels that are alcalzan to see: The "orbs" would be identical and have a size and symmetry more structured if they were a physical attribute because manufecture of the camera.

4.

Why no one has suggested an explanation of "natural" to the rest of my photos? I still expect many answers.
5. Thanks for questioning
Fe I learn a lot ... From you (ha ha)

0 comments:

Post a Comment